Higher history evaluate the usefulness answer
WebHow do you write "Evaluate the usefulness of the source" questions? This is a 6 mark question, which I answer using an anagram which helps you to remember each of the points you need to include to achieve full marks. The anagram I use is: TACL which stands for Time, Author, Content and Limitations. Time: When was the source written? WebUsefulness of a short training seminar on how to handle difficult patients in simulated education Kiyoshi Shikino1,2, ... To evaluate the usefulness of the seminar, ... (92.1%) of the 63 participants gave a score of 5 or higher on the 7-point Likert scale. The mean score of “acquisition of new knowledge” was 5.7±1.3, and 57 (90.5%) ...
Higher history evaluate the usefulness answer
Did you know?
Webusefulness of the source because it may exaggerate the threats posed to the Tsar in an attempt to increase the chances of the Tsar wishing to step down as leader as the … WebS837/77/11 History Date — Not applicable Duration — 3 hours Total marks — 90 Attempt ONE section only. Attempt BOTH parts of your chosen section. Write your answers clearly in the answer booklet provided. In the answer booklet you must ... Evaluate the usefulness of Source C as evidence of the extent of Viking control of the
Web7 de mar. de 2001 · Type 1: Evaluate the Usefulness of a source • Evaluative comments relating to author, type of source, purpose, timing (4 marks) • Evaluative comments relating to source content (2 marks) • Evaluative comments relating to points of content omission (2 marks) • 6 marks awarded in total r e p a P 3 7 01 ue WebSource C is an extract from the Chronicle of Walter of Guisborough. This makes the source useful, as chronicles were generally factually based accounts of historical events in chronological order, which could make information about the subjugation of the Scots in 1296 factually reliable.
WebThe EVALUATE THE USEFULNESS question The task in this question is to make a series of judgements about the value or usefulness of the source. This question is worth 5 or 6 marks. You should try to comment on the following: WHO wrote the source (authorship). WHEN the source was written. What TYPE of source it is. Web18 de dez. de 2024 · How do you get evaluation marks in higher history? Evaluation marks are given when you support your argument with new evidence you have not yet discussed in analysis/KU. You must also compare 1 factor to another. To be awarded marks for E1/2 you must: Make a judgment on the importance of a factor (very important/ …
WebSCOTTISH HISTORY — 36 marks Attempt ONE Part. Write your answers clearly in the answer booklet provided. In the answer booklet you must ... Evaluate the usefulness of Source A as evidence of the reasons for the growth of Protestantism by 1560. In reaching a conclusion you should refer to
WebHow do you write "Evaluate the usefulness of the source" questions? This is a 6 mark question, which I answer using an anagram which helps you to remember each of the … hill\\u0027s science diet perfect weightWebImplementation and evaluation of Stanford Health Care direct-care teledermatology program Akhilesh S Pathipati 1 and Justin M Ko 2. Abstract Introduction: Teledermatology has proven to be an effective means of providing dermatologic care. The existing research has primarily evaluated its usefulness in a consultative model. hill\\u0027s snacksWebEvaluate the usefulness of Source A as evidence of the conditions faced by slaves during the Middle Passage. (You may want to comment on what type of source it is, who wrote it, when they wrote it, why they wrote it, what they say and what has been missed out.) 5 Source B is about the impact the slave trade had on the Caribbean islands. Source B hill\\u0027s rd catWebPerson as author : Pontier, L. In : Methodology of plant eco-physiology: proceedings of the Montpellier Symposium, p. 77-82, illus. Language : French Year of publication : 1965. book part. METHODOLOGY OF PLANT ECO-PHYSIOLOGY Proceedings of the Montpellier Symposium Edited by F. E. ECKARDT MÉTHODOLOGIE DE L'ÉCO- PHYSIOLOGIE … hill\\u0027s urinary careWebHigher History – Paper 2 questions This page outlines the way to answer questions in Paper 2 of the Higher History exam. * General information and marking * ‘ How fully?’ questions * ‘ Evaluate the usefulness’ question * How much? questions * Explain questions Share this: Twitter Facebook Loading... smart californiaWebThe source was written at the end of October 1915 which makes it useful because it was in the immediate aftermath of the battle (1 mark for origin: timing). The content is about the … smart california snacksWebTo achieve your best marks in evaluating usefulness, you need to demonstrate a sophisticated evaluation of historical sources by providing both reasons FOR a … smart california casual dress code