site stats

Tata cellular v. union of india summary

WebMar 8, 2024 · The Court also relied on the decision of the Apex Court in *Tata cellular Vs Union of India(1994) 6 SCC 651(SC) **which had held that the scope of judicial review of an administrative decision is extremely limited and can only be exercised to scrutinize the decision making process. WebJun 29, 2024 · Placing reliance on Tata Cellular v. Union of India (“Tata Cellular”) the Supreme Court observed that under Article 226 of the Constitution, a High Court cannot act as an appellate court and substitute its own decision …

Tata Cellular vs Union Of India on 26 July, 1994

Web3.The Department of Telecommunications, Government of India, invited tenders from. Indian Companies with a view to license the operation of "Cellular Mobile Telephone. Service" in … WebIn spite of the borrowings they have been awarded 6, 8 (full marks), 5 and 7 respectively. The company, Tata Cellular, which had not borrowed at all from the commercial banks, has … primary care doctors in mesa az https://telgren.com

tata+cellular Indian Case Law Law CaseMine

WebOct 13, 2024 · In India the doctrine of proportionality was adopted by the Supreme Court of India in the case of Om Kumar v. Union of India.[1] In this case the Apex court observed that Indian courts have been using this doctrine since 1950, in cases of legislations violating fundamental rights enshrined in Article 19 (1) of the constitution. WebFeb 27, 2014 · 93. In Union of India v. Hindustan Development Corpn.6 this Court held thus : (SCC p. 515, para 9) “. the Government had the right to either accept or reject the lowest … WebAug 27, 1997 · In Tata Cellular vs. union of India. It was observed by this Court after referring to Brind that the principles available in administrative law were basically illegality, irrationality (Wednesbury unreasonableness) and procedural impropriety. However, it was possible that more grounds could be added in future, - like proportionality. primary care doctors in milton ma

Union of India and Another v/s G. Ganayutham - LawyerServices

Category:New Horizons Limited v/s Union of India - LawyerServices

Tags:Tata cellular v. union of india summary

Tata cellular v. union of india summary

NATIONAL JUDICIAL ACADEMY - NJA

WebAs laid down in State of U.P v. Maharaja Dharmander Prasad Singh18 judicial review is confined to decision- making process. This being an administrative action the scope of … WebIn Tata Cellular v. Union of India 3 (para 113) the Supreme Court laid down the following basic principles relating to administrative law: (SCC pp. 687-88, para 94) ... Where the principle of promissory estoppel applies e.g. in Union of India v. Indo Afghan Agencies Ltd. 43, Motilal Padampat Sugar Mills Co. Ltd. v. State of U.P. 44, etc.

Tata cellular v. union of india summary

Did you know?

WebThe weight of the authorities laid down in the Council for Civil Service Unions v. ... [1948] 1 KB 223, Tata Cellular v. Union of India 1994 SCALE (3) 477 and host of other judgments makes it clear that when it comes to judicial review of administrative action, it is the process which must be reviewed and not the merits of the decision. WebJul 26, 1994 · Tata Cellular v/s Union of India Civil Appeal Nos. 4947-50 of 1994 with Nos. 4951 and 4952 of 1994 Decided On, 26 July 1994. At, ... the local authority has …

WebSep 9, 2024 · THE SUMMARY OF RULE 3 : ... the law laid down in the case of Tata Cellular vrs. Union of India, AIR 1996 SC 11 lays down the basic principles which still hold the field. WebOct 9, 2015 · In Tata Cellular v. Union of India [10] , it was held that in case of a judicial review of a presidential pardon, the court does not act as a court of appeal since it lacks the expertise to correct an administrative decision, but reviews the manner in which the decision was made concerning itself with the sole question of legality.

WebIn Tata Cellular v Union of India, Government of India issued invitations to all the mobile operators to establish networks in the four metro cities. Evaluation Committee which was … Webf 56 OM KUMAR & ORS V UNION OF INDIA [Vol.1Iss.1. In the matter of Sri Virendra Nath, on a Consideration of the report of Justce Chinnappa Reddy, the. report of the Inquiry Officer, and the recommendations of the UPSC which were favourable to the. officer on both occasions and the order of the disciplinary authority which accepted the finding ...

WebThe point as to the extent of judicial review permissible in contractual matters while inviting bids by issuing tenders has been examined in depth by this Court in Tata Cellular v. Union of India; (1994) 6 SCC 651. (e)In State of U.P and Another. v.

WebSep 17, 2024 · The bench quoted the following principles laid down in Tata Cellular v. Union of India 1994 SCC (6) 651: (1) The modern trend points to judicial restraint in … primary care doctors in mesahttp://courtverdict.com/supreme-court-of-india/tata-cellular-vs-union-of-india playbook online courses for startWebSep 13, 2024 · In Tata Cellular v. Union of India [1] the Court observed that the modern trend points to judicial restraint in administrative action. The same view has been taken in a … primary care doctors in monroe miWebFeb 6, 2012 · See the decisions of the Supreme Court in Tata Cellular v. union of India [(1994) 6 Supreme Court Cases 651], New Horizons Limited and another v. Union of India and others, [(1995) 1 Supreme Court Cases 478], Directorate of Education and others v. EducompDatamatics Ltd. and others, [(2004) 4 Supreme Court Cases 19], and Association … playbook permit root login yesWebThis doctrine has come up for discussion in Charan Lal Sahu v. Union of India 16. 49. Whatever it may be, Indian Telecom cannot take the point of bias. It took the chance and … primary care doctors in mt pleasant scWebBench: Mohan, S. (J) PETITIONER: TATA CELLULAR Vs. RESPONDENT: UNION OF INDIA DATE OF JUDGMENT26/07/1994 BENCH: MOHAN, S. (J) BENCH: MOHAN, S. (J) VENKATACHALLIAH, M.N. (CJ) PUNCHHI, M.M. CITATION: 1996 AIR 11 1994 SCC (6) 651 … primary care doctors in middletown njWebJun 7, 2024 · In Union of India v. Parma Nanda,14 the Supreme Court took a very narrow view. In that case, an employee was charge sheeted along with two other employees for preferring false pay bills and bogus identity card. In inquiry all of them were found guilty. A minor punishment was imposed on two employees, but the primary care doctors in modesto ca