Tata cellular v. union of india summary
WebAs laid down in State of U.P v. Maharaja Dharmander Prasad Singh18 judicial review is confined to decision- making process. This being an administrative action the scope of … WebIn Tata Cellular v. Union of India 3 (para 113) the Supreme Court laid down the following basic principles relating to administrative law: (SCC pp. 687-88, para 94) ... Where the principle of promissory estoppel applies e.g. in Union of India v. Indo Afghan Agencies Ltd. 43, Motilal Padampat Sugar Mills Co. Ltd. v. State of U.P. 44, etc.
Tata cellular v. union of india summary
Did you know?
WebThe weight of the authorities laid down in the Council for Civil Service Unions v. ... [1948] 1 KB 223, Tata Cellular v. Union of India 1994 SCALE (3) 477 and host of other judgments makes it clear that when it comes to judicial review of administrative action, it is the process which must be reviewed and not the merits of the decision. WebJul 26, 1994 · Tata Cellular v/s Union of India Civil Appeal Nos. 4947-50 of 1994 with Nos. 4951 and 4952 of 1994 Decided On, 26 July 1994. At, ... the local authority has …
WebSep 9, 2024 · THE SUMMARY OF RULE 3 : ... the law laid down in the case of Tata Cellular vrs. Union of India, AIR 1996 SC 11 lays down the basic principles which still hold the field. WebOct 9, 2015 · In Tata Cellular v. Union of India [10] , it was held that in case of a judicial review of a presidential pardon, the court does not act as a court of appeal since it lacks the expertise to correct an administrative decision, but reviews the manner in which the decision was made concerning itself with the sole question of legality.
WebIn Tata Cellular v Union of India, Government of India issued invitations to all the mobile operators to establish networks in the four metro cities. Evaluation Committee which was … Webf 56 OM KUMAR & ORS V UNION OF INDIA [Vol.1Iss.1. In the matter of Sri Virendra Nath, on a Consideration of the report of Justce Chinnappa Reddy, the. report of the Inquiry Officer, and the recommendations of the UPSC which were favourable to the. officer on both occasions and the order of the disciplinary authority which accepted the finding ...
WebThe point as to the extent of judicial review permissible in contractual matters while inviting bids by issuing tenders has been examined in depth by this Court in Tata Cellular v. Union of India; (1994) 6 SCC 651. (e)In State of U.P and Another. v.
WebSep 17, 2024 · The bench quoted the following principles laid down in Tata Cellular v. Union of India 1994 SCC (6) 651: (1) The modern trend points to judicial restraint in … primary care doctors in mesahttp://courtverdict.com/supreme-court-of-india/tata-cellular-vs-union-of-india playbook online courses for startWebSep 13, 2024 · In Tata Cellular v. Union of India [1] the Court observed that the modern trend points to judicial restraint in administrative action. The same view has been taken in a … primary care doctors in monroe miWebFeb 6, 2012 · See the decisions of the Supreme Court in Tata Cellular v. union of India [(1994) 6 Supreme Court Cases 651], New Horizons Limited and another v. Union of India and others, [(1995) 1 Supreme Court Cases 478], Directorate of Education and others v. EducompDatamatics Ltd. and others, [(2004) 4 Supreme Court Cases 19], and Association … playbook permit root login yesWebThis doctrine has come up for discussion in Charan Lal Sahu v. Union of India 16. 49. Whatever it may be, Indian Telecom cannot take the point of bias. It took the chance and … primary care doctors in mt pleasant scWebBench: Mohan, S. (J) PETITIONER: TATA CELLULAR Vs. RESPONDENT: UNION OF INDIA DATE OF JUDGMENT26/07/1994 BENCH: MOHAN, S. (J) BENCH: MOHAN, S. (J) VENKATACHALLIAH, M.N. (CJ) PUNCHHI, M.M. CITATION: 1996 AIR 11 1994 SCC (6) 651 … primary care doctors in middletown njWebJun 7, 2024 · In Union of India v. Parma Nanda,14 the Supreme Court took a very narrow view. In that case, an employee was charge sheeted along with two other employees for preferring false pay bills and bogus identity card. In inquiry all of them were found guilty. A minor punishment was imposed on two employees, but the primary care doctors in modesto ca